NFL 2014

53-20,

That has nothing to do with us beating the Cowboys

Nope, but it means you record isn't them same as the Packers either, they are 1 up on you

Sorry about your Eagles Blondie, I knew they were in trouble when Foles went down, Mark Sanchez is NOT a NFL QB!

I don't put the blame all on him though. Our defense is ridiculous with penalties - they just give away too much, especially on 3rd down.

True, that late season melt down was Cowboyesque, I thought the Eagles would get in, I would rather have them in the playoffs instead of Detroit!

how well the Boys are doing right now is especially insulting.

There is just no reasonable explanation for losing to Washington. NONE

Detroit has a winning season and Meeps goes awol

coincidence?

he's still on Facebook

I don't know why he quit here though.

Because he knows they can't beat the Packers...

Ez wrote:

Because he knows they can't beat the Packers...

apparently Buffalo can

But not the Eagles...

no but I think we've established that we suck this year after all

Lol

Im glad they suspended Suh, that was cheap and dirty yesterday

Ez wrote:

Im glad they suspended Suh, that was cheap and dirty yesterday

he's a dirty effin player, he stepped on his ankle twice.

I think he should be banned from the NFL, he is a serial rule breaker/dirty player. Playing in the NFL is a privilege, not a right!

Go Packers, don't let us down now

Whoo, They got a gift, but I will take it, on to Seattle.

I was a little worried

It's a fitting end to the season for the Boys

Yea, they really cant complain about getting screwed by a call, plus, there was still 4 minutes left, GB probably still wins

looks like the pats and Gb have a good shot at it, if GB can get by the seahawks.
The pats I think had their hardest test already in the ravens and should have an easier time with the colts.

Green Bay has a huge obstacle to over come to get there, I don't know if a one-legged ROdgers can take down the Seahawks in Seattle.

you're expressing doubt!?!?

If Rodgers was healthy, no, but I don't think they can win in Seattle if he can't move around

you never know

it wasn't looking good on Sunday and they pulled it together in time

so that was disappointing - Green Bay sent their defense home a little early yesterday

There were way to many mistakes, unable to convert 2 goal to go for TD's, not getting a first down in the 4th qtr, not recovering the onside kick, this one stings

there's always next year

Ez wrote:

There were way to many mistakes, unable to convert 2 goal to go for TD's, not getting a first down in the 4th qtr, not recovering the onside kick, this one stings

unbelievable, it was hard to watch that, they had shut seattle down for 3 1/2 quarters, then just fell apart.

I really thought they had that game won.



BTW- the Patriots are sending a thank you card for ripping shermans arm apart, that should help them a little in a couple of weeks

He is such a warrior, I gained so much respect for him yesterday

yeah he was was clearly in pain, but stayed on the field. i couldn't believe they weren't trying to throw it his way more often.

He is a warrior, but I still have a problem liking him, he's too much of a blowhard

Figuring EZ got his wish, I went to have a shower when it was 19 - 7
got out of the shower to hear very loud roaring coming from the living room
went dripping wet to see to my utter astonishment that the sore was now 22 - 19
what an unbelievable end to the game

This one will sting for a while

looking back settling on a couple of field goals seems like a dumb idea

There were too many mistakes to pick just one, playing prevent defense on 3rd and 19, trying to run the clock out with 2 1/2 quarters to go, etc. When you play to not lose that is usually what happens.

Ez wrote:

There were too many mistakes to pick just one, playing prevent defense on 3rd and 19, trying to run the clock out with 2 1/2 quarters to go, etc. When you play to not lose that is usually what happens.

and despite all of those errors, they were LIGHT YEARS better than the colts were.

that was a world class beat down, they were beaten on every single play for the entire game.

now if the pats can stop the beast, they will have number 4.

( not that i really care, my gints already took 2 from the Pats , but being a new englander, by default i have to root for them in the playoffs if my team isn't there)

I love how controversy follows the Patriots whenever they do well. Now its deflated ball gate. do they switch the ball out for every possession? otherwise, how would that benefit them? And why would Brady need help?

iwantmycrayons wrote:

Ez wrote:

There were too many mistakes to pick just one, playing prevent defense on 3rd and 19, trying to run the clock out with 2 1/2 quarters to go, etc. When you play to not lose that is usually what happens.

and despite all of those errors, they were LIGHT YEARS better than the colts were.

that was a world class beat down, they were beaten on every single play for the entire game.

now if the pats can stop the beast, they will have number 4.

 ( not that i really care, my gints already took 2 from the Pats , but being a new englander, by default i have to root for them in the playoffs if my team isn't there)

funny how that doesn't work here - if the Eagles aren't in it, I don't HAVE to root for the Giants due to their proximity. In fact, I've been told that rooting for the Giants is forbidden no matter what We tend to root for whoever is playing against the others in our division.

blondie wrote:

iwantmycrayons wrote:

Ez wrote:

There were too many mistakes to pick just one, playing prevent defense on 3rd and 19, trying to run the clock out with 2 1/2 quarters to go, etc. When you play to not lose that is usually what happens.

and despite all of those errors, they were LIGHT YEARS better than the colts were.

that was a world class beat down, they were beaten on every single play for the entire game.

now if the pats can stop the beast, they will have number 4.

 ( not that i really care, my gints already took 2 from the Pats , but being a new englander, by default i have to root for them in the playoffs if my team isn't there)

funny how that doesn't work here - if the Eagles aren't in it, I don't HAVE to root for the Giants due to their proximity.  In fact, I've been told that rooting for the Giants is forbidden no matter what   We tend to root for whoever is playing against the others in our division.  

well if the Pats were in the same division, then I would be barred from rooting for them. I have never rooted for the cowboys redskins or eagles and wish them them nothing but continued failure

I've been dying to use this smiley!

I'm rooting for the Pats for the superbowl. Good a team as any I guess.

iwantmycrayons wrote:

Ez wrote:

There were too many mistakes to pick just one, playing prevent defense on 3rd and 19, trying to run the clock out with 2 1/2 quarters to go, etc. When you play to not lose that is usually what happens.

and despite all of those errors, they were LIGHT YEARS better than the colts were.

that was a world class beat down, they were beaten on every single play for the entire game.

now if the pats can stop the beast, they will have number 4.

 ( not that i really care, my gints already took 2 from the Pats , but being a new englander, by default i have to root for them in the playoffs if my team isn't there)

Despite all those errors they still should have won the game, Bostick is the new Buckner.

DEFLATEGATE
really, REALLY????!!!!!


the patriots could have been using a wtermelon and beat the Colts on Sunday, and the news is covering possibly slightly deflated balls??/

I say the colts balls were deflated after they got their ass kicked like that

They always want a reason why the Pats win, how about they are a Damn good football team? Also, don't both teams use the same balls, so who was it an advantage to?

they're also blaming the Pats for why the Superbowl ticket prices are down

Ez wrote:

They always want a reason why the Pats win, how about they are a Damn good football team? Also, don't both teams use the same balls, so who was it an advantage to?

that's what I said - they don't change balls on every possession, right?

apparently each team uses it';s own set of balls on offense, only the kicking balls are supplied by the NFL. each team gets 12 balls they submit to the officials and supposedly are checked 2 hours before the game, but to me if there was a noticable differnce, the officials should have picked up on it when placing the ball, about 200 damn times a game for each play. to me it's nothing.

even if they had slightly deflated the balls, how does that help a running back who steamrolled through your line for 3 touchdowns??/

shouldnt the story have been about the Colts apparent lack of balls

ExpletiveDeleted wrote:

shouldnt the story have been about the Colts apparent lack of balls

I agree, but it will be blown( see the pun there??) out of proportion. it appears that 11 of the 12 balls were under inflated, now who do you blame for it?? a ball boy, a faulty air pressure gauge??an official who didn't check the pressure?? no they will blame the head coach who i am sure was responsible for making sure the effin balls had the right pressure cuz he really doesn't have anything better to do.

To me the balls should be handled at game time, any time after they have been turned over tio the league for use in the game, byt someone who works for the NFL, not a ballboy who works for the patriots or any other team. seems like it just makes sense to eliminate any possible tampering with balls.

I mean the less high school boys you have touching balls on the sidelines the better